Nielsen Norman Group Logo  
NN/g    useit.com    jnd.org    AskTog
Nielsen Norman Group
View shopping cart for report downloads at eSellerate
Strategies to enhance the user experience  
Home People Services Publications Events About NN/g
NN/g Home > Publications > Investor Relations Usability
                        

Nielsen Norman Group Report:

Usability of the Investor Relations Area of Corporate Websites:
Guidelines from Usability Studies with Individual Investors, Institutional Investors, Financial Analysts, and Business Journalists

Second Edition
 
Download Report (PDF file, 202 pages) 202 pages PDF format
Download your copy of the report instantly (from eSellerate)

$248 for a single report, $468 for the report and the right to make copies within your organization. (No shipping/handling fees will be added: it's an immediate download directly from the server.)


Summary

IR is a natural for the Web. Companies can provide many types of IR services as self-service — at hugely reduced costs — as long as the user interface is sufficiently good.

Investors, both individual and professional, want more than just the data that independent services can provide. They want the company's own story and investment vision. What they don't want is to wade through complex or irrelevant information. Balancing all this is the challenge for the IR user experience: You must provide both simplicity and vision, connect with investors without antagonizing them, and serve both professionals and people with little financial knowledge. To achieve this balance, your design must focus on users' needs.

The report contains 103 guidelines for improving the design of IR areas of corporate websites, and is richly illustrated with 164 color screenshots from many different websites, showing usability problems we found in our testing as well as examples of highly-usable IR pages.

> sample chapter as thumbnail pages
> Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox summarizing the report

This report shows what happens when real investors try to use IR pages.

We observed users as they performed investment-oriented tasks on 52 company websites, selected to cover a range of industries and countries. In addition to the 52 sites tested, we performed usability reviews of an additional 42 sites, meaning that the report is based on evaluations of 94 companies' IR information.


Test Participants

User testing was conducted in 5 cities in the U.S., U.K., and China:
  • New York
  • Boston
  • San Diego
  • London
  • Hong Kong
We chose these cities because they include the main centers of the investment business as well as more mainstream locations.

We tested four categories of users:

  • individual investors
  • institutional investors who make decisions for mutual funds or other companies that invest large sums
  • financial analysts and advisors who recommend investments to others
  • journalists who write about finance for business publications or major newspapers

Table of Contents

202-page report.
  1. Executive Summary
    • Usability Research
    • Investment Professionals
    • Individual Investors
    • Standard Information Architecture
    • Simple Information Design
    • Changes in IR Usability Since First Edition
    • Potential for IR on the Web
  2. Research Overview
    • The Procedure
    • The Participants
      • Websites Studied
      • Examples in this Report
  3. What Various Audiences Need from Company Websites
    • Individual Investors
    • Financial Analysts
    • Professional Investors
    • Financial Journalists
  4. Prioritizing Financial Information
    • High Priority — Most Important
    • Medium Priority — Nice to Have or Helpful
    • Low Priority — Not important or Not Often Used
  5. Information Architecture for IR
  6. Getting to Corporate Information
  7. Company Information
  8. Stock Quote
  9. Stock Charts
  10. Company Financials
    • HTML and PDF Formats
  11. Calendar/Events
    • Email Alerts
  12. Webcasts
  13. Slide Presentations
  14. Contacting IR
  15. Usability Basics
  16. International Considerations
  17. Methodology
    • The Procedure
      • Part 1 — Usability Testing
      • Part 2 — Card Sorting and Prioritization Exercises
    • Participants
    • Web Experience Criteria
    • Criteria for Professional Participants
      • Business/Financial Journalists
      • Professional Investors
      • Financial Analysts
    • Open-Ended Tasks
      • Individual Investor Scenario
      • Professional Investor Scenario
      • Financial Analyst Scenario
      • Financial Journalist Scenario
    • Directed Tasks
    • Websites Studied

Comparing the Editions

 

If you already own the first edition of this report, should you buy the second edition?

Probably not, because most of the important guidelines were already present in the first edition.

Comparison of the editions:

1st edition 2nd edition
Guidelines 65 103
Page count 121 202
Screenshots 95 164
Websites tested 20 52
Additional sites reviewed - 42
Report Size 4 MB 19 MB

What You Get

 
  • Checklist of 103 specific design recommendations: review your website and its IR section for these 103 items, and you will discover several things that need improvement.
    • The average website typically violates about half of our usability guidelines. You might have the one perfect site in the world that does everything right, but the odds are against you. It is safest to score your design against a checklist of usability guidelines to make sure you don't do anything wrong.
  • Description of how investors, analysts, and business reporters behave when using a wide variety of IR sites, including extensive quotes (often colorful, because they were often annoyed). Learn from the users' comments and reactions to common design mistakes in the IR sections we tested.
  • 164 screenshots of IR pages with descriptions of why they worked well for investors or caused them problems in usability testing.
  • Recommended information architecture for IR pages, at three levels: for a low, medium, and high investment in online IR. Deriving a rough IA to serve as the starting point for your own design usually costs a hundred times the price of this report.
  • $300,000 of user research with investors and analysts at 0.1% of the cost.
  • Test methodology description, allowing you to run your own user tests of your own design.
  • Knowledge to make your IR information easier for business journalists to use; thus getting more press coverage. The business value of better PR depends on the company, but is usually substantially higher than the cost of this low-priced report.

Who Should Read This Report?

This report has important information for:
  • Anybody who is responsible for the design or content of Investor Relations online
  • IR professionals wishing to advise their clients on proper use of the Web
  • Executives in charge of communications strategy for a major corporate website

Running a similar usability study yourself to collect comparative design lessons from a large number of websites around the world with investors, financial analysts, and journalists would cost more than $300,000 and several months of an experienced usability professional's time.

Please help us continue publish low-price reports by buying a site license if you have colleagues who will read the report. If you only need it for yourself, then that's obviously what the single-user license is for. If somebody "gives" you a copy, then please buy a download anyway to keep prices down in the future.

Download Report (PDF file, 202 pages) < strong >Download Report (from eSellerate)
$248 for the PDF file (202 pages)
$468 for site license to make copies

                        
  

Press Coverage

CNN:
Do investor-relations web sites work?

Investor Relations Magazine:
IR web sites lack the basics

IR Web Report:
Lots wrong with IR websites, study finds
and
Usability guru weighs in against image-based reports

Line56:
Relating to investor relations

AccountingWeb:
Study looks at investor relations web sites

 

See also Related Reports
Press (PR) area of corporate websites. Investors often go there when looking for news.

"About Us" area of corporate websites.

Frequently Asked Question: Alternative Payments
If you do not want to buy online, we accept other forms of payment:
  • Check
  • Bank transfer
  • Purchase orders
  • Faxed or mailed credit cards

We can also send you a paper invoice if your company requires that.

Frequently Asked Question: File Format Used
The report is a standard PDF file, formatted to print on both 8.5x11 and A4 paper. Any recent version of the Acrobat Reader will suffice to read or print the file. No special software is needed. The file is not copy-protected: we trust you to buy a site license if you are going to have multiple people read the report.

See also Related Tutorial
Full-day public tutorial at our annual Usability Week conference:

Writing for the Web 2, covers presentation of advanced content types, such as IR information.


NN/g Contact Information

Copyright © 1998-2009 Nielsen Norman Group. All Rights Reserved