| |
|
 |
235 pages PDF format
Download Report (from eSellerate)
$198 for a single report,
$398 for the report and a site license to make copies within your organization and place on your own intranet.
(No shipping/handling fees will be added: it's an immediate download directly from the server.)
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
This report reviews the designs and usability of ten intranets that were chosen from a much larger number of nominated designs. The report is richly illustrated with 116 screenshots, giving readers the unique opportunity to see good intranet designs that are usually hidden behind a firewall. The
ten winning intranets are:
- Banco Español de Crédito (Banesto), the third largest bank in Spain
- Cisco Systems, the world's leading computer networking vendor (U.S.)
- Electrolux, the world's largest manufacturer of powered appliances (Sweden)
- The Integer Group, the seventh largest promotional marketing agency (U.S.)
- NedTrain, the Dutch National Railway's maintenance subsidiary (The Netherlands)
- Orbis Technology, a small software developer (U.K.)
- Park Place Dealerships, operator of ten luxury automobile dealerships (U.S.)
- Procter & Gamble, a leading manufacturer of branded consumer goods (U.S.)
- Schematic, an interactive design and technology agency (U.S.)
- Verizon Communications, a leading telecommunications company (U.S.)
Most of the intranets represent big companies with large amounts of documents and mission-critical applications such as sales force support. But some of the winning designs represent small knowledge-intensive companies, proving that great intranet usability can be found in a wide variety of places.
The bulk of the report consists of detailed case studies of each of the ten winning intranet designs, including discussions of the main problems they faced, how these problems were overcome in the redesign process, and how the new design compared with the previous design.
> Read Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox: main trends in this design annual
> See sample chapter as thumbnails
> 2005 Intranet Design Awards: Learn more about the winning teams
|
|
Best Practices
|
|
Some of the key areas for which best practices are presented in the report are:
- Encouraging employees to self-publish content
- Keeping the intranet up-to-date
- Supporting factory-floor employees
- Collaborating with clients through an extranet
- Customer relationship management
- Consistent navigation
- Multilingual intranets; supporting international employees
- Online video; executive communications
- Collaboration tools and discussion boards
- E-learning features on intranets
- Intranet as driver for corporate culture and to promote corporate values
- Wiki systems on intranets
- Intranet search
- Development process for intranet redesigns
- Promoting intranet launches; campaigns to encourage use of new features
- Staffing of intranet teams; where they report in the organization
- Updating and maintaining standards and guidelines for intranet design
|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
235 page report with 116 screenshots
- Executive Summary
- The Winners
- Advanced Design Concepts
- Beyond the Office
- Internationalization
- Technology Confusion
- Design Process
- Improvement Metrics
- Overview of the Winners
- Common Themes Among the Winners
- Kiosks for Intranet Access are Becoming Commonplace
- Good news
- Video and TV
- Adding and Editing Content
- Banco Español de Crédito (Banesto)
- Summary
- URL and Access
- Content Management
- Technology
- Goals and Constraints
- Basic intranet Features
- Users
- User Tasks
- Background
- Design Process and Usability Activities
- Timeline
- Results
- Lessons learned
- Cisco Systems, Inc.
- Summary
- URL and Access
- Content Management
- Technology
- Goals and Constraints
- Basic intranet Features
- Users
- User Tasks
- Background
- Design Process and Usability Activities
- Timeline
- Results
- Lessons learned
- The Electrolux Group
- Summary
- URL and Access
- Content Management
- Technology
- Goals and Constraints
- Basic intranet Features
- Users
- User Tasks
- Background
- Design Process and Usability Activities
- Timeline
- Results
- Lessons learned
- The Integer Group
- Summary
- URL and Access
- Content Management
- Technology
- Goals and Constraints
- Basic intranet Features
- Users
- User Tasks
- Background
- Design Process and Usability Activities
- Timeline
- Results
- Lessons learned
- NedTrain
- Summary
- URL and Access
- Content Management
- Technology
- Goals and Constraints
- Basic intranet Features
- Users
- User Tasks
- Background
- Design Process and Usability Activities
- Timeline
- Results
- Lessons learned
- Orbis Technology
- Summary
- URL and Access
- Content Management
- Technology
- Goals and Constraints
- Basic intranet Features
- Users
- User Tasks
- Background
- Design Process and Usability Activities
- Timeline
- Results
- Lessons learned
- Park Place Dealerships
- Summary
- URL and Access
- Content Management
- Technology
- Goals and Constraints
- Basic intranet Features
- Users
- User Tasks
- Background
- Design Process and Usability Activities
- Timeline
- Results
- Lessons learned
- Procter & Gamble
- Summary
- URL and Access
- Content Management
- Technology
- Goals and Constraints
- Basic intranet Features
- Users
- User Tasks
- Background
- Design Process and Usability Activities
- Timeline
- Results
- Lessons learned
- Schematic
- Summary
- URL and Access
- Content Management
- Technology
- Goals and Constraints
- Basic intranet Features
- Users
- User Tasks
- Background
- Design Process and Usability Activities
- Timeline
- Results
- Lessons learned
- Verizon Communications
- Summary
- URL and Access
- Content Management
- Technology
- Goals and Constraints
- Basic intranet Features
- Users
- User Tasks
- Background
- Design Process and Usability Activities
- Timeline
- Results
- Lessons learned
- Recommendations for the Intranet Design Process
- Watch People Work
- Conduct Usability Evaluations
- Measure ROI
- Consider Accessibility
- Encourage Employees to Contribute Content
- Intranets Not Selected: Common Issues
- Homepages Cluttered With Sometimes Useless Information
- Lack of News, or Uninspiring News
- Inconsistent Design or Wildly Inconsistent Navigation Across The Intranet
- Selection Criteria and Process
|
|
How Can We Sell This Report So Cheaply?
|
|
Most other consulting companies and analysts would charge a thousand dollars or more for a report like this. A mid-sized company could increase employee productivity by tens of thousands of dollars if its intranet benefited from even a single good idea from this report. Big companies stand to gain millions.
Despite investing half a year's effort and the work of several of the world's most experienced usability professionals in the project, we can sell the report at a dramatically lower price than other companies who put much less work into their reports, because we distribute it over the Web, with a much leaner cost structure than having an army of salespeople to schmooze you.
Our only plea is that you help us continue publishing low-price reports by buying a site license if you have colleagues who will read the report. If you only need it for yourself, then that's obviously what the single-user license is for. If somebody "gives" you a copy, then please buy a download anyway to keep prices down in the future.
|
|
Who Should Read This Report?
|
|
Anybody in charge of an intranet or its design.
 |
Download Report (from eSellerate) $198 for the PDF file (235 pages, 116 screenshots), single-user license $398 for a site license to make copies and place on your intranet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative Payments |
If you do not want to buy online, we accept other forms of payment:
- Check
- Bank transfer
- Purchase orders
- Faxed or mailed credit cards
We can also send you a paper invoice if your company requires that.
|
File Format |
| The report is a standard PDF file, formatted to print on both 8.5x11 and A4 paper. Any recent version of the Acrobat Reader will suffice to read or print the file. No special software is needed. The file is not copy-protected: we trust you to buy a site license if you are going to have several people read the report.
|
|